Vaclav Smil is a prolific writer of books that explain how the world uses energy. Past titles include Making the Modern World – Materials and Dematerialization, Energy Transitions, Energy Myths and Realities, Energy: A Beginner’s Guide and Energy and Civilization: A History. If you want to understand the physics, chemistry and economics of energy, you need go no further. Natural Gas: Fuel for the 21st Century is four years old, but still provides a solid grounding in its importance for many decades to come.

What we call natural gas is mostly methane (CH4), and it’s been produced by the decomposition of organic matter on earth for at least 3 billion years. Rising concentrations of atmospheric methane can be traced back to the expansion of rice cultivation in Asia, thousands of years ago, and didn’t just begin with the industrial revolution. Ethane and propane are often present in the natural gas mix, although methane dominates. Methane is burned in power plants to produce electricity, and is used for heating and cooking in most homes. Ethane tends to be most valuable as a petrochemical feedstock into plastics, while propane is used to generate heat in various industrial processes, in backyard barbecues and in some cases for transportation.

The Shale Revolution in America has been as much about natural gas as crude oil, although it’s the latter that draws more attention. Natural gas relies heavily on pipelines for transportation, so long term purchase agreements are common in order to justify the significant capital investment in necessary infrastructure. One of the most remarkable energy stories in the last decade is how the U.S. switched from planning greater natural gas imports to becoming a major exporter, as domestic production swelled. Greg Zuckerman’s The Frackers recounts how Cheniere Energy turned reoriented Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) terminals from import to export.

Facts and figures are the very essence of Smil’s books, providing support for every statement. Methane has relatively low energy density, which is why it has to be converted to near liquid form before loading onto LNG tankers; otherwise, the economics of shipment would be unattractive. This is also why it’s not used in road vehicles, where propane’s higher energy density makes it preferable although gasoline dominates because it has even higher energy density.

Natural gas storage is often underground, in depleted natural gas reservoirs, porous rock formations or salt caverns. A giant aboveground tank 100 meters in diameter and 100 meters tall would only hold enough natural gas to heat around 500 Canadian homes during a typical winter. Methane’s high combustion efficiency has led modern residential natural gas-fired furnaces to reach efficiencies of 95-97%. No other fuel is this efficient. In power plants it generates less than 60% as much CO2 as coal. Developing technology may bring further, dramatic improvements (see Clean Fossil Fuels May Be Coming). America’s switch from coal to natural gas for electricity generation is why greenhouse gas emissions have fallen. It’s also why getting China and India, the world’s big coal users in the coming decades, to rely more on natural gas is one of the most important ways the world can combat global warming.

Today’s Energy Transition anticipates the global economy’s move from fossil fuels to zero-carbon based energy. The role of natural gas in this transition is hotly debated – as the cleanest burning fossil fuel, Smil believes (as do we) that it’s going to be part of the solution to lowering emissions. The religious zeal of climate extremists makes no distinction between coal and natural gas, or the impracticality of eliminating 80% of the world’s energy sources. Because this is so unappealing to most people, global emissions grow and Greta lectures ineffectively to virtue-seeking audiences (listen to Davos Talks Climate Change).

Smil provides many more useful insights about natural gas, which will be discussed in a later blog. For a highly informative read, pick up a copy of Natural Gas: Fuel for the 21st Century.

On Thursday my wife and I boarded a plane from Newark, NJ to Charlotte, NC. Although Governor Murphy is slowly relaxing the lockdown restrictions that have been imposed on New Jerseyans, it is an incremental process. Each minor restoration of a freedom lost is quietly celebrated. Restaurants will soon be allowed to open for outdoor dining. Hair salons will reopen with limited capacity,  but no news yet on dentists. The sequence is slow and opaque.

We’re in the minority, believing living in a free country includes selecting your risks. Frequent hand washing, masks in public places and social distancing are completely reasonable and courteous. Those at high risk of serious illness are generally in well-defined groups. If you’re worried, stay home. Destroying so many small business owners’ life’s work deserves more consideration than it’s getting.

We await each new missive from the governor without much idea of their framework or schedule. Little is said of the destruction to New Jersey’s already precarious fiscal outlook, but we know eventually the Coronavirus bill will come due. Expect much complaining as ruinously high property and income tax rates are tweaked even higher.

NJ has suffered around 12,000 deaths, 80% of whom were over 65. It doesn’t need saying but I shall anyway, that each death is tragic and my heart goes out to every family. Related but not comparable is that 1.2 million NJ residents have filed for unemployment.

The fatalities didn’t cause the job losses. We shut the economy down to prevent more deaths. Suppose without lockdown, it would have been twice as bad. The lockdown meant 12,000 people survived who otherwise wouldn’t have. Let’s suppose this lucky group is also 80% over 65.

In this scenario, the ratio of jobs lost to coronavirus fatalities avoided is 100:1. Versus working age fatalities it’s 500:1. These ratios have no optimal value, and some may find the concept crass. But they do seem high.

Since we long ago flattened the curve and a vaccine is a 2021 event at best, life needs to rapidly adapt to whatever new normal is.

Newark airport was eerily quiet. Everyone is required to wear a mask. The TSA estimates passenger volumes at 15% of normal, which looked about right. There was virtually no line at security, even for the non Pre-check crowd. Most airport stores were closed. Restaurants had plastic wrapped their seating to further dissuade visitors, even though no meals are on offer. It was rather sad.

On hearing we’d be flying, most friends commented on the risk of infection. Modern aircraft have HEPA air filters which are apparently fine enough to catch the virus. Fear is constraining all kinds of travel, but most have nowhere to go. Pandemic restrictions in some form are everywhere.

But the choice to endure lockdown in New Jersey from early March would have few takers. For several weeks even walking in a forest or park was forbidden. We vowed then to visit somewhere else, almost anywhere, once my wife’s obligations as an online pre-school teacher were complete. North Carolina, a rental car and a plan to drive south to Charleston, SC and then beyond, beckoned.

When we exited the plane at Charlotte, two passengers walked 40 feet and sat down at the first bar they’d seen in three months.

Coronavirus has constrained life in South Carolina too. Museums are closed, but restaurants are open for indoor seating with socially distanced tables. As we were walking through historic Charleston, we excitedly pointed through a window at four people sitting at a restaurant table indoors. The diners looked back, regarding us with some amusement.

South Carolina has less than a fifth as many cases as NJ, and 8% of the fatalities, adjusted for population. Of course, NJ has fared worse than anywhere except neighboring epicenter New York City. So just traveling away from NJ was likely to be an improvement.

Visitors to Charleston are way down. Our original hotel reservation was canceled because the owners suddenly decided to carry out renovations.

Nonetheless, life in Charleston is more agreeable and probably our new normal. We ate our first meal out in three months. Tables were generously distanced and the waiter wore a mask. Turns out he and his girlfriend fled Queens, NY two months ago. We understand.

It’s surprisingly difficult to figure out what dividends are doing for midstream energy infrastructure. Just about every company has a free pass on cutting its payout nowadays. Prudent cash management isn’t going to draw much criticism with the size of the economic shock we’re enduring. Given the beating energy stocks suffered during 1Q20, a few dividend cuts would have been forgiven.

In spite of this, the biggest midstream energy infrastructure companies have maintained their payouts. In 1Q earnings calls, the overall message was that while it was hard to make confident long term forecasts, management teams felt comfortable with the resiliency of their businesses. The result is that the top ten midstream energy infrastructure companies by market cap have raised their payouts by an average of 4.7% over the past year.

None of them reduced dividends at their most recent announcement dates. Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) doesn’t pay a dividend. Kinder Morgan (KMI) raised theirs by 5% compared to the prior quarter.

As we noted recently, free cash flow growth remains a positive story for these companies (see Pipeline Cash Flows Will Still Double This Year).

Alerian has echoed the positive news about distributions. They noted that, “The majority of midstream constituents grew or maintained dividends over 1Q19.” This was supported by a chart showing 68.5% of Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index (AMZI) components by market cap did just that. It sounds like a great story.

Unfortunately, characterizing distributions in this way presents a misleading picture. A majority maintaining or growing suggests that aggregate payouts for the group are similarly stable. They are not.

Distribution cuts at MLPs have been far more prevalent than at corporations – because the AMZI index consists of MLPs, it is more exposed to crude oil pipelines and to gathering and processing than the American Energy Independence Index (AEITR), which reflects the North American midstream sector as a whole. AMZI doesn’t reflect the industry. MLPs also tend to have lower credit ratings. As a consequence, MLP distributions are turning out to be less resilient than those paid by pipeline corporations.

Most companies tend to raise distributions/dividends gradually, by a few percent at time. By contrast, cuts are often 50-100%. So even though the majority of AMZI by market cap maintained or raised their distributions, the payout on the Alerian MLP ETF, AMLP, has just been cut again.

The AMZI is down to only 20 constituent companies now, and because 11 of them slashed their distributions, this was enough to force AMLP to cut its payout. This contrasts with the story for AMLP’s index, AMZI, which is being spun to sound superficially good.

It turns out that size matters. The three biggest MLPs, which are in the top ten midstream companies by market cap, all maintained or grew their payouts. The biggest companies in this sector tend to be more stable and have higher credit ratings.

AMLP investors care more about another cut than the spin being put on its index.

SL Advisors publishes the American Energy Independence Index

We are invested in KMI and LNG

The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects CO2 emissions to fall 8% this year. This is six times the reduction that followed the 2008 financial crisis, reflecting the far greater drop in economic activity. Transportation has plummeted — peak congestion on roads in March was estimated down 50-60% in major cities around the world including Los Angeles, Sao Paolo and Mumbai. The IEA estimates that aviation fuel demand was down 27% in March. This likely understates the actual fall. TSA figures show passenger traffic through security checkpoints down over 95% in March and April.

Even the most die-hard climate extremist can hardly cheer this news, given the circumstances. But the size of the drop will take emissions back almost a decade. If the world had only twelve years left before climate change catastrophe, as Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) asserted last year, we can now make it to 2040.

Energy demand from the transportation sector may never fully recover. Working from home has been less disruptive than imagined. On earnings calls with pipeline companies, whenever the topic came up CEOs noted that working remotely was fine. Facebook is just one company whose workforce will largely be remote for the rest of the year. Less commuting, less business travel and vacations closer to home could become permanent. Declining use of public transport for fear of infection may partially offset this, but overall the pandemic’s impact on energy demand will most likely be a long-lasting reduction.

Coal demand has also been hit hard. China burns half the world’s coal, and it produces around 70% of their electricity. Nothing meaningful can happen on climate change without China (listen to our podcast: China Keeps Warming the Planet).  The lockdown lowered Chinese power demand, shrinking coal consumption. In the U.S., coal-fired power demand in 1Q was down by a third compared with a year ago (a mild winter, cheap natural gas and greater use of renewables helped).

Climate extremists will continue to press their case, but they’re unlikely to gain new adherents in the next few years. Falling emissions and the urgency of repairing the huge economic damage we’re enduring will drive public policy. As we count the human cost of the lockdown in terms of neglected health, business failures and emotional trauma, returning to the economy we had will be a priority.

We need to be better prepared for the next pandemic. The World Health Organization (WHO) called climate change the biggest global health threat of the 21^st century. They warn of 250,000 additional deaths annually from climate sensitive diseases starting in 2030 (like AOC, they believe we have around a decade left). Coronavirus deaths will be multiples of this figure when the numbers are finally added up.

The WHO’s website on climate change adds that, “The direct damage costs to health is estimated to be between USD 2-4 billion per year by 2030.” This number is derisively insignificant compared to the trillions we’re spending in America in financial support alone. Similar fiscal support along with economic losses are occurring globally.

The WHO pursued politically correct groupthink (listen to our podcast: Climate Change Was Never Our Biggest Threat). They were trying to be woke. It’s time they woke up.

This reordering of priorities is bullish for the energy sector. Jim Cramer often points out that young money managers won’t invest in fossil fuels because of climate change. Many will retain that bias, but that’s now yesterday’s trade. At the margin, rebuilding our economy and the current sharp drop in emissions will trump global warming. High school dropout Greta can resume her education — remotely. The world’s focus has shifted.

For a graphic picture of how the restaurant business has shut down, it’s hard to beat the OpenTable chart below. For several weeks, U.S. dinner reservations on their system have run at 100% below normal (i.e. there were none).

What portion of this sector survives depends on the pace at which we re-open, combined with the public’s perception of risk.

When it comes to risk assessment, human behavior is not always driven by numbers. Flying is an example – although aviation deaths are extremely rare, terrifying media coverage overwhelms the data, which is that around 150,000 commercial flights are completed safely every day worldwide (pre-Coronavirus).

Some find the imagery overpowers the logic, and as a result they drive because they feel safer, even though 38,000 Americans die annually on the roads.

That type of risk aversion does relatively little harm to society – the individual who chooses to drive 1,000 miles bears most of the additional risk from that decision.

Fear of nuclear energy has caused much more harm, by impeding our use of a zero-carbon source of electricity, thereby increasing use of coal. HBO’s Chernobyl series last year could have done great harm to the future of America’s nuclear power business if its prospects weren’t already so bleak. In the popular imagination, the image of a peacetime mushroom cloud creates visceral opposition. Per terrawatt hour of electricity produced, nuclear kills 1/1,000^th as many people as coal. But the coal deaths from pollution are steady and unrelenting, while events leading to deaths from nuclear are spectacular.

There are still no recorded deaths from the 2011 nuclear accident at Fukushima, Japan, although 2,259 deaths are blamed on the subsequent evacuation. Three Mile Island also caused no deaths.

Public policy decisions on Coronavirus seek to find a balance between minimizing loss of life from the virus itself, and the less measurable collateral damage (economic and health) from shutting down much of life as we knew it. Although there are instances of lockdown protests, opinion polls show widespread support.

Dinner reservations provide a view of how one industry is being impacted. Some regions are slowly reopening, and anecdotal evidence so far suggests that, even with the mandated reduced capacity to maintain social distancing, there are plenty of open tables.

Although policymakers will determine when businesses can re-open, the public’s assessment of risk may lag. Society’s vulnerable members are generally well defined as the older and those with other serious health issues (see footnote on chart below). Statistics on road deaths and aversion to nuclear power show both extremes of risk tolerance. We’ll soon find out where Coronavirus risk sits on this spectrum.

Chart note: Due to the time lag in filing death certificates, the CDC currently counts around 37K COVID-19 deaths, roughly half the generally accepted figure.