Williams Companies Promotes the Little Blue Flame

Last Thursday Williams Companies (WMB) held their investor day in New York. WMB owns and operates an extensive natural gas network, and is a top ten U.S. midstream energy infrastructure company. Like most big pipeline companies, it’s omitted from the Alerian MLP indices because it’s not an MLP. CEO Alan Armstrong conceded that the company had in recent years become too closely identified with the oil business and fracking. He said they need to refocus attention on the little blue flame in every kitchen’s stovetop, emphasizing a cleaner, more positive message.

Their presentation opened with some useful slides on the long term, global outlook for natural gas. Although most investors in this sector follow crude oil prices because they drive sentiment among energy investors, our investments are more focused on natural gas because it’s the cleanest burning fossil fuel and we believe has a clearer growth path over the next several decades.

The Shale Revolution has produced an abundance of natural gas in America, which means that it’s not only cleaner than other fossil fuels but also the cheapest form of residential heating. So far, the benefits of this abundance have flowed to the consumers of cheap energy and not the producers, as energy investors know well. Figuring out how to better monetize America’s energy renaissance consumes management teams and investors.

Substantial press coverage is focused on climate change and the opportunity of renewables to impede global warming. Solar and wind remain fringe sources of overall energy, a statement often regarded as incendiary by climate extremists but easily supported in the above chart. Electricity is 20% of global end-use energy consumption, with solar and wind providing 2% and 5% respectively. So at 7% of power generation, which is itself 20% of global energy use, they’re 1.4% of the total. Natural gas substitution for coal has been far more effective in lowering emissions, and attracts thoughtful advocates for cleaner energy.

An estimated 17,300 children younger than 15 die every day because of insufficient access to energy, according to UNICEF (the United Nations Children’s Fund). The moral high ground is solidly occupied by those engaged in providing more energy to poor countries, including investors in WMB. Climate extremists impede this progress, and offer no solutions. Their warped, Malthusian philosophy cares little for today’s human suffering.

Global energy consumption is going to continue increasing, because it drives higher living standards which are desired by at least half the world’s population. Non-OECD countries are forecast to increase their energy demand by half over the next twenty five years. Any serious impact on emissions will turn on the form in which this increased energy is delivered. China is the world’s biggest polluter and consumes half the world’s coal. If natural gas replaced all the world’s coal, it would lower CO2 emissions by 17%, an enormous change. The world isn’t about to make such a bold move, but because natural gas is expected to fulfill 45% of global demand growth through 2040, its gain in market share is contributing to a cleaner planet.

Finally, we show a slide on valuation. Valuation metrics such as Enterprise Value/EBITDA and yield have become less attractive for REITs and utilities in recent years, while they’ve moved in the opposite direction for midstream energy infrastructure. Investors know this well, but the macro outlook for natural gas must surely mean that a company such as WMB, positioned as well as anyone to profit, is cheap and should be substantially higher.

We are invested in WMB.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
8 replies
  1. Mike S
    Mike S says:

    Thank you for the comments on Williams investor day. Were there any company comments or do you have any insights on their financial sensitivity to continued low nat. gas prices; especially exposure to Chesapeake ? If I remember correctly the two firms renegotiated terms a couple of years ago, WMB got some upfront cash in return for taking more commodity price risk. Now nat. gas prices seem stuck in mid $2’s/mcf and CHK share price is <$1/share with going concern risk.

    It seems to me that many WMB slides are all about growing natural gas volumes and demand without key details about commodity price sensitivity of the WMB business model. That is something that I think the company should calculate and communicate. Peer Kinder Morgan does this for investors. Right or wrong, I have in mind WMB exposure to CHK as a key risk over last couple of years and the travails of CHK have kept me away. (Though I own WMB though sector funds)

    I am also concerned and find it very misleading that the company seems to proudly tout recent asset sale multiples and recent capex rates of return while ignoring the massive writedowns in recent years on some acquired and older assets. The company and investors need to look at returns on capital across the portfolio. I think those ROIC returns are around a middling 6%. And with all the moving parts, I cannot tell if ROIC will be getting better or worse.

    • Simon Lack
      Simon Lack says:

      Mike, on natgas price sensitivity, they did comment that NT weakness can affect volumes somewhat, but that also stimulates demand. They didn’t offer much detail beyond that. KMI’s oil sensitivity related to their EOR business which does have direct price sensitivity, so somewhat different. No question WMB has overpaid for assets in the past, including Access Midstream. CHK is 8% of their business. They noted that many CHK wells are JV’d with PE, so in cases where CHK wishes to spend less on production the JV partner can take disproportionate share and adjust split of remaining reserves as a ppropriate.

    • King Lee
      King Lee says:

      In regard to CHK, on the Q&A section of the presentation beginning at about 3:10:00, CHK was discussed. Managment was confident that they would be paid because they provided the gathering and no gathering implies no gas to sell. To paraphrase management, WMB has be stiffed on NGL pipes, etc, but never in gathering.

      Unmentioned, I think, is expected revenues from off-shore tie-ins with the natural gas from the GOM. I think revenues are expected in 2011. There will be very little cap ex for the tie in.


  2. Ronald Guggemos
    Ronald Guggemos says:

    Simon….it appears that the moral high ground claimed by the climate extremists may be flawed as they conveniently step over the bodies of those that need engery to survive. Ron Guggemos

  3. DerHundistLos
    DerHundistLos says:

    “environmental extremists”, “looney left”. The blatant pandering to AGW denialists and ecocidal Trumptards was brilliantly displayed in your talk about natural gas flaring. Your comments provide strong anecdotal evidence for the near-perfect negative correlation between intelligence and Republican identification. Well done.

  4. Jacques G.
    Jacques G. says:

    >RE: Renewables won’t solve these issues

    The issue of people cooking with wood or biomass is currently being addressed by the use of solar ovens. There are workshops being done in certain countries to show people how to build solar ovens with cheap materials.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.