Markets interpreted Fed Chair Jay Powell’s press conference bearishly last week. This was mostly because of omissions – he didn’t rule out raising rates at a faster pace than once a quarter, and he didn’t rule out beginning with a 50bp hike in March. As ever, monetary policy will be data-dependent.

Eurodollar futures flattened further, with a faster pace of tightening being priced in while a cycle peak of 2% remains. The powerful feature of interest rate futures is that market prices rarely if ever fail to reflect available information. For the Fed to succeed in bringing inflation back to 2% without even raising rates above that level seems unrealistically optimistic, but one can scarcely suggest that investors have overlooked this implication. A substantial number must find this plausible. December ‘24 eurodollar futures yield almost exactly 2%, and to us a trade to 2.5% seems far more likely than 1.5%. The data will determine it.

The 4Q21 Employment Cost Index registered a 1% increase in total compensation – down from 3Q21 1.3% but nonetheless a 4% rate for the year.  We all know businesses that are struggling to hire people. Labor is tight. PCE inflation is running at a 5.8% annual rate. Both these reports were better than expected, and bonds consequently recouped earlier losses to finish the week roughly unchanged. The Fed’s languid normalization of monetary policy reflects their expectation, or hope, that incoming data will assuage the sting of criticism from past Fed members Treasury secretaries, and others.

Critics include David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, who said “They are behind the curve and they are guilty of being too easy for too long,”

Wall Street tightening forecasts are ratcheting up. Goldman and JPMorgan expect five this year; Bank of America seven; Nomura expects 50bps in March. The incongruity in the market is a yield curve forecasting a 2% cycle peak along with ten year inflation expectations of only 2.5%, which with real yields of –0.7% is anchoring ten year treasury yields below 2%. It’s hard to see how both forecasts can be correct – we think inflation is most likely to be higher, but for that reason the rate cycle peak probably will be as well.

Like the Fed, the path of rates will be data dependent.

In other news, US natural gas prices drew attention when front month futures jumped sharply just prior to the February contract expiration. Volumes were low and covering by a few tardy short sellers probably the cause. Europe’s vulnerable gas supplies may be a factor, but the US has limited ability to make up any Russian shortfall because Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) export facilities are running close to capacity. The most likely result of a Russian invasion of Ukraine would be reduced European consumption as energy intensive industries are forced to halt production, either by ruinous prices or government edict.

This is turning out to be more than simply a short-term problem. TTF futures, the European LNG benchmark, have been increasing two years out, exposing the enormous strategic error planners in Germany and elsewhere have committed in relying so heavily on Russia. January ‘24 futures have more than doubled from a year ago. European households will be paying more for electricity.

The price difference to the US is easily sufficient to draw more US LNG exports if they weren’t capacity constrained. However, shipments will increase over the next year or so, which will modestly underpin domestic prices and support volume growth. Forget about what the climate extremists may strive for – global natural gas demand is going to grow, to the benefit of investors in producers and midstream energy infrastructure.

For further confirmation of the energy sector’s newfound fiscal prudence, note the decline in its share of S&P500 capex between 2014 and now. Thanks to Barry Knapp of Ironsides Economics for highlighting this in his very readable weekly newsletter. The White House is caught between proclaiming the demise of traditional energy while pleading with OPEC to increase production. Energy investors are benefiting from higher prices with less spending.

Finally, the ever-colorful Jim Cramer weighed in against the hapless Cathie Wood and her ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) with a clip that’s gone viral. The Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF (SARK) bets directly against ARKK’s holdings, and Cramer memorably emptied a bottle of Cutty Sark over a table of figures representing ARKK. It’s 25 seconds of theatre masquerading as unconventional investment advice – although worth noting that in SARK’s brief existence its investors have done better than ARKK’s, since the latter are net down (see ARKK’s Investors Have In Aggregate Lost Money). Cramer must like Buffet’s quip (“If you’re not going to kick a man when he’s down, when are you going to?”) even at the cost of his chivalrous credentials.

We have three funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Inflation Fund

Please see important Legal Disclosures.

.

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.