Midstream is mercifully removed from all the angst and excitement of AI stocks and crypto – although in a modern version of selling pickaxes to goldminers, natural gas and its infrastructure enable much of this activity. You have to admire the response of MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor to the bitcoin collapse which has crushed his stock price.

“Volatility is Satoshi’s gift to the faithful” said Saylor recently, invoking Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonym attributed to bitcoin’s founder. Such uber-confidence would badly shake mine if I was invested with Saylor.

But it’s safe to say that our risk appetites have little in common. I have no bitcoin and only wish the best for my friends who do. Tangible assets with well covered dividends that are growing are our thing.

To invoke Ben Graham, crypto is for those who rely on the stock market as a voting machine, while midstream is for those who use it as a weighing machine. For the latter, including your blogger, the spread between a company’s Return On Invested Capital (ROIC) and its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) provides enduring excitement.

Recent figures from the Wells Fargo Show Me The Money report, when compared with stock price performance,  illustrate a solid relationship. Targa Resources (TRGP), Cheniere (LNG) and Williams Companies (WMB) all show a healthy spread between what they pay for capital and what they earn on it.

Kinder Morgan continues to prove that when management discusses “growth capex opportunities,” investors should prepare for more capital misallocation.

Commensurate stock price performance followed.

Energy Transfer has combined a relatively low spread with decent stock performance, which is probably due to its very low price five years ago as we came out of the pandemic, flattering returns. Nonetheless, even today the 8% distribution yield 2X covered by Distributable Cash Flow looks like a glaring market oversight, as improbable as that sounds for a company with a $56BN market cap.

The one year total return forecast for ET is 38%, 35% and 45% at JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo respectively.

The difference in ROIC over the past five years across companies is surprisingly large given the predictability of cashflows in the industry. Wells Fargo now forecasts ROIC for the next five years and unsurprisingly expects persistence in the skill that capital allocators exhibit.

As a group, midstream companies are improving at deciding which projects to finance. The shale revolution represents the nadir, with the five year periods ending in 2016 and 2017 especially poor. The most recent lustrum* equaled the 11.8% record set in 2022.

Encouragingly, Wells Fargo expects the period ending in 2031 to produce a median ROIC of 13.5%. Oil and gas volumes are growing. Data centers are sprouting up everywhere to support the AI revolution. Behind The Meter (BTM) deals that provide natural gas directly to a dedicated power plant, bypassing the grid, are proliferating. Wells Fargo counts 4GW of BTM deals that have reached Final Investment Decision, up from 2GW in July. This will continue to ramp up.

Exports of liquefied natural gas will double by 2030. So far in 4Q25 they’re running at 16.2 Billion Cubic Feet per Day (BCF/D), up from 13.3BCF/D in 4Q24.

The projected ROIC could be wrong. Perhaps some capital will be committed too exuberantly, in a re-run of a decade ago. But it’s also possible that today’s valuations are wrong. Companies have discovered the virtue of capital discipline with its concordant impact on stock prices.

Therefore, it’s a paradox that Enterprise Value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) has weakened to 9.6X, well below the ten year average of 11.0X. Market prices are implying an ROIC substantially below the Wells Fargo forecast and probably below the median of recent years. A move up in EV/EBITDA from 9.6X to 10.6X would increase enterprise values by around 10% and equity values by twice that given the roughly 50/50 equity/debt split that prevails.

Fund flows are barely positive for the year, with recent months offsetting inflows in 1Q25. This year might yet break a streak of seven consecutive years of outflows.

The combination of growing volumes, improving capital allocation and twin demand drivers for gas might ordinarily induce value-driven investors to buy. This is a sector of tangible assets full of concrete metrics well suited to the weighing machine type of investor.

To paraphrase Michael Saylor, today’s attractive valuations are a gift to the discerning investor. The breathless excitement of crypto and AI commands the attention of many. When they start voting their money differently, we suspect that stable dividends will become fashionable once again.

Pipeline investors are used to being paid to wait. It’s only boring over the short run.

Recently, long-time investor Emerson Fersch interviewed me to discuss the history of midstream and its outlook. You can watch it here.

*A lustrum is half a decade.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.