The Market’s Too Relaxed About Interest Rates
Mohamed El-Erian maintained his criticism of the Federal Reserve, with an op-ed on Monday morning (see Fed and ECB still behind the inflation curve). It’s remarkable that the ECB’s “hawkish pivot” simply resulted in a fourth quarter tightening no longer being off the table. The Fed meanwhile moves ahead in their predictable fashion even while their predictions about inflation are wrong.
It’s easy to criticize the Fed’s delinquent normalization of policy, but also worth acknowledging that they have engineered a booming economy with full employment, rising asset prices and unmet demand for almost everything. It seems churlish to complain about inflation under such circumstances – given the labor market, many workers can simply demand higher pay to compensate for rising prices.
Last Friday’s employment report showed that’s roughly happening – average hourly earnings for all employees rose 5.7% over the past twelve months. A week earlier, the Employment Cost Index (ECI), which is released quarterly, showed compensation of private industry workers rose 4.4% last year. Pay increases across groups ranged from 3.5 percent for management, professional, and related occupations to 7.1 percent for service occupations.
CPI inflation is running at 7%. Without food and energy, it’s lower at 5.5%, but excluding these now makes little sense because everybody uses energy and eats. These two components can swing around which is why economists like to exclude them, but currently they’re going up like everything else.
Some will always find reasons to be despondent, but asset prices and employment are high while interest rates remain low. The drop in labor force participation is partly due to higher than average numbers of new retirees, enabled by swollen 401Ks and downsizing to a smaller home on better terms than they ever expected. A more popular president would be emboldened to quote Britain’s former PM Harold MacMillan, who in 1957 said his countrymen had, “never had it so good.” Hold on to this economic moment – it will one day be a fond memory.
Economic orthodoxy dictates that we embrace the hair shirt of higher rates as penance for such good economic fortune. So we will. But the Fed will need to create a headwind to all these positives long before inflation is back down to its 2% target. It’s implausible that this will happen without short term rates moving above 2%. Being a Fed critic is satisfyingly self-indulgent, but not as useful as figuring out how to profit from their actions.
Last month in Why You Shouldn’t Expect A Return To 2% Inflation we noted the incongruity of well-contained ten year inflation expectations with a modest 2% rate cycle peak, all as derived from the bond market. The yield curve hasn’t shifted much since then – an ECI report slightly better than expected was later neutralized by the strong payroll report.
Today’s FOMC interprets its dual mandate of maximizing employment consistent with stable prices in a way that is more risk-tolerant of inflation while more desirous of seeing everyone employed. Americans’ willingness to tolerate a Fed-induced slowdown in pursuit of price stability is untested in over 30 years. Fed chair Jay Powell often says, as he did last month, “We will use our tools to support the economy and a strong labor market and to prevent higher inflation from becoming entrenched.”
For now, Biden has provided political cover for the Fed by endorsing their long-awaited policy shift. Nonetheless, it’s easy to imagine Powell’s Congressional critics once unemployment starts to rise: coping with 7% inflation is bad enough when you’re employed, but harder when you’re out of work.
We’ve been warned for decades that fiscal profligacy will lead to disaster, and so far Stephanie Kelton’s Modern Monetary Theorists are winning that debate (see Reviewing The Deficit Myth). Why is 2% inflation any more vital to our economic wellbeing than a Debt:GDP ratio below 100%? We’ve already abandoned the latter with no apparent consequence.
AOC and her squad are ready to pounce.
Esther George, President and CEO of the Kansas City Fed, gave a speech recently in which she cited research showing that the Fed’s bulging balance sheet is depressing long term bond yields by as much as 1.5%. Take away that support, and ten year treasuries would yield almost 3.5%, forecasting a rate cycle peak easily above 2%. The presence of such support limits the impact of rising short term rates on the economy, requiring an even higher cycle peak than would be the case if the Fed’s balance sheet was back at pre-2008 levels.
The actionable trade is to bet on a higher cycle peak – shorting treasury securities or eurodollar futures with a three to five year maturity is the most efficient. They should eventually price in a Fed Funds rate of 2.5-3%. If by then the economic pain is audible in Congress, tolerance of 3% long term inflation will start to look more likely than a 3% overnight rate. But one or the other is assuredly coming – and probably both. This week’s CPI report may be a catalyst.
We have three funds that seek to profit from this environment:
Please see important Legal Disclosures.
The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments. Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.
References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)
This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r
Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.
Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!