Investors are routinely advised to incorporate some international exposure into their portfolios. This can be to add diversification or, in the case of emerging markets, to participate in faster-growing economies. For a US-based investor, this is at best a waste of time. Worse, it can introduce unneeded complexity, cost and poor returns.

By investing in countries that are developing quickly, the hope is that faster growth in GDP and incomes will translate into higher equity returns. This approach has provided years of disappointing results. It’s been good for investment managers who charge high fees to provide specialized access to such markets, but not for their clients.

The first mistake is to confuse GDP growth with equity returns. Take those famous empty, unfinished apartment buildings across China. Their construction generated economic activity and boosted GDP, but they’re not generating returns for the capital that financed them. Capex that fails to generate a return above its cost destroys equity value and isn’t limited to profit-seeking enterprises. Governments are equally capable of poor investment choices.

In fact, for many countries the transmission mechanism linking GDP growth and equity market returns is weak. There is ample literature on this point, such as Triumph of the Optimists (2001) which examined a century’s worth of data. The analysis was updated in 2021 with similar conclusions. An academic paper from 2022 (What Matters More for Emerging Markets Investors: Economic Growth or EPS Growth?) provided confirmation.

Moreover, direct investing in foreign markets incurs risk to foreign concepts of property rights, disclosure, accounting standards and fair markets. Many countries aspire to American standards, but few achieve them. I remember visiting India years ago to meet with local hedge fund managers and being told by a regulator that there was no insider trading in their markets. In such cases the only plausible approach is to invest with inside information or not at all. We never invested in Inda.

Then there’s the quandary of which foreign markets to choose and what allocation to make. Done properly, this requires substantial research of relative valuations, investor protections and economic prospects. This level of analysis is way beyond all but the most sophisticated institutional investors.

The S&P500 contains most of the world’s biggest companies. Almost all of them do business overseas. Investors are often surprised at the portion of revenues these 500 companies generate outside the US, which Factset calculates at 41%. It’s not just the Technology sector either – all eleven sectors have some exposure outside the US, although not surprisingly it’s low for Utilities and Real Estate. But the figures should provide comfort to any S&P500 investor who fears his holdings are too parochial.

What’s the right allocation? 500 boards of directors and executive teams have considered the opportunities from Argentina to Morocco to Vietnam and have invested accordingly. Their blended exposure to different countries represents the aggregate best thinking of this group. It’s crowdsourcing – the result of so many independent opinions is likely to be better than the informed view of an individual investor.

In addition, these companies have navigated through local regulations, taxes, property rights, accounting standards and politics in making those choices. Put another way, if the American Widget Company listed on the NYSE decides to create a subsidiary in Brazil, you’re better off getting your exposure through them than trying to identify a Brazilian widget company listed in Sao Paulo.

Instead of trying to identify Indian companies that will give you exposure to that country’s growing middle class, why not let Apple do it for you.

The Wall Street Journal recently advised its readers to allocate around a third of their portfolios internationally. Ironically this is less foreign exposure than the S&P500 currently provides. An investor who followed this advice would wind up with more than half their exposure outside the US, an imprudent choice for someone living in America.

The WSJ article ignored the abovementioned research and instead noted that, “Overseas equities are beating domestic shares for one of the few times in 15 years…” Most of the market advice from the media is on trading. Investors don’t hop into a sector on the basis of a few good months. So much energy is spent on timing rather than strategy.

The S&P500 offers ample diversification and a more efficient, safer way to access investment opportunities beyond our borders. Shun the advice of the poorly informed adviser who wants to make your portfolio more complicated and therefore renders his advice harder to evaluate.

Simpler can be better.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.