Performance in the pipeline sector remains strong – closing in on its fourth straight year beating the S&P500 and ahead overall for the past five. But for the past six months the Alerian MLP Infrastructure ETF (AMLP) has increasingly lagged the sector, as defined by the American Energy Independence Index.

AMLP is more or less tracking its index, the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index (AMZIX), although taxes are opening up a gap here too. It’s 2.4% behind over the past year through September. Over 4% of its NAV is set aside for future taxes.

Between December 2022 and June 2023 AMLP took two NAV adjustments as their accountants revised their tax calculations (see AMLP Trips Up On Tax Complexity and AMLP Has Yet More Tax Problems).

Being a tax-paying ETF is complicated. Those two adjustments added up to over 6% of NAV.

Last year AMLP cut its distribution (see AMLP Fails Its Investors Again) even though MLPs were raising payouts.

But the problem is that the AMZIX index which AMLP tries to track represents a shrinking subset of midstream infrastructure, since it’s limited to MLPs. AMLP labors under the same burden.

The boom in data centers to support AI is driving electricity demand up. Nuclear power is enjoying a renaissance with several of the Fabulous Five announcing plans to rely on dedicated nuclear plants to provide electricity to their new data centers.

These are positive steps for everyone outside of the Sierra Club with its dystopian vision for humanity. But these new sources of nuclear power won’t be available until well into the next decade.

In many regions of the US grids are revising their ten-year demand outlook from 0-1% pa to 5% pa or more. Natural gas is the only plausible solution, since data centers need to run 24/7 not simply when it’s sunny or windy.

This realization has boosted midstream infrastructure. Williams Companies (WMB) CEO Alan Armstrong recently told investors, “… we frankly are kind of overwhelmed with the number of requests.”

WMB is up over 50% YTD as they recalibrate demand across their extensive natural gas pipeline network.

MLPs generally haven’t enjoyed the same uplift, because they tend to be more focused on liquids than gas. In recent years many MLPs converted to c-corps, the conventional corporate form for US businesses, so as to eliminate K1s in favor of 1099s. They concluded that making their stock available to all buyers of US equities and not just those willing and able to invest in partnerships was worth foregoing the tax efficiency of the MLP structure.

Natural gas MLPs have had an additional incentive to convert to corporations since 2018 when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a ruling that impeded their ability to incorporate tax expense in their calculation of tariffs for cost of service pipelines.

Prior to 2018 natgas MLPs could include in their cost of service calculations an estimate of the taxes paid by their MLP unitholders. Of course they didn’t actually know what those taxes were, so they made a good faith estimate. Then FERC reversed the rule. Faced with a less generous rate-setting regime, most converted to c-corps.

As a result, there aren’t any pureplay natural gas pipeline MLPs although some like Energy Transfer do operate gas pipelines within their mix of businesses.

As MLPs have become less representative of the midstream sector, so has AMLP. Its relative underweight to natural gas pipelines means it has missed out on the AI-driven rally such stocks have enjoyed. Global sales of gas turbines are forecast to be up 5% this year, driven by the need to power data centers, EV sales and to compensate for intermittent solar and wind. Midstream energy is seeing the benefits of this.

In other news, FERC rejected a plan by Talen Energy’s Susquehanna Nuclear facility to provide power to Amazon data centers. The regulator felt there was some risk that rates could rise for other customers on the PJM grid. This setback is unique to the Talen plant and doesn’t affect plans announced by Microsoft and Google to rely on nuclear power for their planned data centers.

In a note on Monday Wells Fargo predicted this could shift gas demand to Texas, where unlike PJM their ERCOT grid operates outside of FERC regulatory oversight. The net result is that the demand outlook for natural gas continues to be robust.

The impact from AI is rippling unevenly across midstream, benefiting natural gas c-corps but not liquids-oriented MLPs.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.