To trade the daily moves in the market is to be an armchair strategist. JPMorgan estimates the crude oil market reflects a 17% probability of a worst-case supply disruption out of the Middle East. Presumably an oil spike would hasten the war’s conclusion via US pressure on Israel.

So Israel’s attacks on energy infrastructure are focused on disrupting Iran’s domestic supplies. Therefore, Iran must have an incentive to impede flows. Perhaps their military capabilities have already been too degraded to provide this option. Or maybe this country with few friends in the region doesn’t wish to further alienate its neighbors.

Will there be a ceasefire? Or will the US use bunker-busting GBU-37 bombs each weighing 30,000 pounds to wipe out Iran’s nuclear capability? To us it seems that the opportunity to destroy the Fordo nuclear site will never be as good as it is now. Few of Iran’s neighbors would be sorry to see the theocracy finally denied the capability to make a nuclear weapon. Trump has promised the world something better than a ceasefire. This would seem to check the box.

But it’s hard to make a confident forecast. The worst case for energy supplies is not the most likely outcome but would cause sharply higher prices. In that regard, midstream companies provide some optionality.

Consequently, the news affecting midstream has been in North America, and therefore drawing less attention than Israel’s pummeling of its long-time adversary.

Last week the Ohio Power Siting Board approved the 200MW Socrates South Power Generation Project. Will-Power, a subsidiary of Williams Companies (WMB), will develop two power plants that will run on natural gas provided by WMB. This is an example of the behind-the-meter (BTM) solution to providing electricity to data centers without impacting residential customers.

WMB as well as other large natural gas companies such as Energy Transfer have been promising BTM solutions to meet the needs of data centers for rapid increases in electricity. Meta will be the main customer of the Socrates project. It is expected to be operational by 2H26, fast by the standards of new power generation. Ohio’s electricity customers won’t be adversely affected.

In an example of what happens when data centers boost demand, residents of New Jersey and other neighboring states that are part of the PJM Interconnection grid system are now paying higher prices for electricity. It’s complicated to assign blame. PJM says 70% of the recent increase in demand is attributable to data centers.

But supply is down too. In 2023 New Jersey’s Democrat governor Phil Murphy mandated that the state cease all hydrocarbon-based power generation by 2035. The state’s last two coal-fired power plants were shuttered in 2022. Windpower has come up short, with Danish firm Orsted abandoning two offshore projects because they became too costly.

Liberals say not enough renewable supply is being added, but they’ve lost credibility on energy policy.

This is exactly the problem that BTM is supposed to avoid. Across the region covered by PJM, data centers are driving up power prices for everyone.

Worried about Democrats being blamed by voters for a big jump in electricity prices when they vote for governor in November, Murphy has announced subsidies for household utility bills.

Democrat energy policies are to blame.

Clean energy stocks dropped sharply yesterday as it became clear that the Senate tax package would immediately end most tax breaks for wind, solar and EVs. Given the lead- times involved and reliance on tax credits, it’s likely that swathes of the renewable energy business in the US will be permanently impaired. The electoral cycle is shorter than their investment cycle, leaving any proposed project at risk.

Renewables have been a lousy investment. The S&P Global Clean Energy Index has returned just 3% pa over the past five years. The American Energy Independence Index has returned 27% pa over the same period.

EVs are losing attraction in western countries. A recent survey carried out by Shell found that only 31% of US owners of conventional cars were interested in switching to an EV, down from 34% last year. The slow rollout of charging infrastructure under the last administration didn’t help, and it’s unlikely to change now. In Europe, interest in switching to an EV fell to 41% from 48%.

EVs continue to gain adherents in China, which is supporting their coal consumption since this provides 80% of electricity generation in China. Progressives who cite China’s EV leadership as evidence of their commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions need reminding of this regularly.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.