Although the war with Iran has inflicted higher energy prices on the world, companies involved in US energy exports have been among the biggest beneficiaries. The availability of oil and gas that doesn’t need to dodge Iranian missiles in the Strait of Hormuz or Houthis as it exits the Red Sea has boosted US trade. Oil exports are running at 5.7 Million Barrels per Day (MMB/D), +57% compared with a year ago.

The continuing stalemate involving low level conflict boosts the prospects for US energy exporters every week it persists. The President’s announcement of “economic warfare” against Iran suggests “strategic patience” is currently driving policy. I talk to a lot of people who voted for Trump and are happy they did so, but few have anything positive to say about the choice to go to war or the way it’s been conducted.

Nonetheless, the protracted interruption of oil and gas shipments out of the Persian Gulf is good for investors in this sector. In time Iran’s influence over world energy markets will dissipate, but building the infrastructure to reroute shipments away from the Strait of Hormuz will take years. In the meantime, US firms are well positioned to gain market share.

South Korea, Japan and India are Asia’s biggest buyers as they’ve sought replacements for what used to come from the Middle East. The Netherlands and UK have shifted from sanctioned Russian oil as Europe ever so slowly disengages from Ukraine’s invader.

Natural gas exports are also growing as additional liquefaction capacity becomes available. The US became India’s biggest LNG supplier in June, shipping 562,000 metric tonnes of LNG (almost 1 Billion Cubic Feet per Day, or 0.9% of US output). This replaced canceled shipments from Qatar. European buyers have been holding out for lower prices, causing Asian buyers to snap up extra cargoes. Europe’s storage inventories of gas are at seasonally low levels at a time when they’d normally be building up in preparation for the winter.

US natural gas production is growing to meet increased demand for domestic power generation and LNG exports. The Iran War hasn’t made a material impact because LNG liquefaction capacity is the limiting factor. Production is growing steadily as new export terminals come online.

US crude exports have also jumped in response to limited flows from the Persian Gulf.

Targa Resources (TRGP) rose 7% on Tuesday following their announcement of a twenty year agreement to provide midstream services to Exxon Mobil in the Permian basin. That’s quite a move for a company with $60BN in market cap. +59% YTD; even by the standards of midstream it’s outperforming.

It’s also interesting though unsurprising to note the growing opposition to data centers. Pennsylvania is the most recent state to impose restrictions on new construction. Politicians from both parties are finding data centers an easy target. They do little for local employment, might boost your electricity prices and then put you out of work.

On the positive side, local opposition, which is increasingly common, does strengthen the appeal of behind-the-meter solutions which deliver natural gas directly to a dedicated power plant, thus bypassing the grid. This suits Williams Companies and Energy Transfer, both of whom are offering this solution to hyperscalers building data centers.

Last week the US Treasury intervened in the bond market, causing yields to briefly drop ten basis points by repurchasing $2BN of bonds. Low rates suit the indebted, including the Federal government. It’s not that they have extra cash lying around, like a corporation recycling profits into buying back stock. Purchases are funded with increased borrowing at shorter maturities. At the margin it helps home buyers by depressing mortgage rates.

But easier credit won’t trim inflation. It’s further evidence that the Trump administration does not have a hard money ethos and will always favor lower rates now at the risk of higher inflation later. Since voters have for decades rejected policies that would rein in our fiscal profligacy, manipulating interest rates to limit the consequences seems logical.

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has been critical of the Fed’s bloated balance sheet, enduring evidence of our partial debt monetization. Should he try to reverse this trend that began during the Great Financial Crisis, it will be his most consequential policy change. Ending Quantitative Easing will enable the full transmission of our fiscal outlook to be reflected in higher bond yields.

It may not go well and may not happen at all.

The challenge in reducing debt monetization is another reason why we believe owning assets that have embedded protection, such as pipelines with their PPI-linked price escalators on the fees they charge, is prudent (see Inflation Protection From Pipelines).

We have two funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.