Midstream had a tough month in September, with the American Energy Infrastructure Index (AEITR) -8.3%, its second worst month in the past five years. Rising treasury yields pressured sectors traditionally owned for their income.  The S&P Utilities ETF (XLU) was –5.9% for the month and is now –5.7% YTD through the third quarter. The Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) was –6.3% and is now +4.2% YTD. The S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index was –7.7% and is +4.4% YTD. The Barclays Agg was –2.6% in September and is –2.8% YTD.

The AEITR’s YTD performance of +17.9% is well ahead of other income-generating sectors, even after a lousy month.

The 1.2% increase in ten year treasury yields over the past year has been fully the result of real yields moving higher. Inflation expectations, defined as the difference between ten year nominal treasuries and TIPs (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) have not budged and sit at around 2.3%.

The University of Michigan survey of consumer expectations has future inflation at around 3%, but similar to the bond market, this figure has been stable.

This is consistent with a positive economic outlook. Real yields have moved up because the market is expecting strong growth.

An important confirmation of this shows up in fund flows. In the twelve months through July, foreign investors bought a record $942BN in US equities and equity funds, while their purchases of US treasuries cooled. China has been steadily reducing their holdings for over a decade, which at $618BN are less than half their peak of $1.3TN in 2013.

It’s also consistent with the S&P500 being +12.8% YTD. In March, weakness in bonds hurt stocks, which were –4.9%. The explanation offered was that the NPVs of growth stocks that dominate the index were acutely sensitive to a higher discount rate on their much higher profits many years out.

Bonds had a worse month in September, but the S&P500 was only –0.4%. Over the past year in eight of twelve months stocks have been up and only two months (March and June) were down by more than 2%.

Surveys continue to defy the positive outlook held by investors. The University of Michigan reported that Consumer Expectations fell to 46.3 in September, down 10.4% year-on-year.  Political affiliation skews the result, but the White House will be frustrated to see that Republicans are becoming more pessimistic at a faster rate than Independents or Democrats.

Your blogger, who has never been surveyed, retains his confidence in America’s bright future, which has always been right.

A steady if unheralded improvement in the financial strength of midstream underpins its 20% five-year annual return, handily beating the S&P500 over that period at 13.8%. Leverage has steadily come down, with many companies in the 3.0-3.5 range Debt:EBITDA, down by 0.5X to 1.0X over the past decade.

Years ago, Kinder Morgan (KMI) used to argue that their diversified asset base could support 5.0X. Rating agencies disagreed, and in 2015 KMI cut their $2 annual dividend by 75%. Even now it’s only $1.19.

Wells Fargo is projecting 4.9% annual dividend growth for the midstream sector.

Capex has been creeping up, but in another sign of improved stewardship it’s mostly financed through internally generated cash rather than public equity offerings. Midstream generates far less in capital markets fees for Wall Street than it used to. The industry has grown while the number of names has shrunk. Today it’s mainly an investment grade, large cap sector.

The growth outlook for natural gas remains dominated by increasing exports and greater power generation. Wells Fargo expects feedstock for LNG terminals to more than double by 2035 (10.2% CAGR), while gas for power generation will grow at 5.6% annually.

Consequently, we think midstream remains attractively priced. The rise in real yields that reflects a robust growth outlook is good for midstream companies, which benefit from higher volumes. The Iran war has boosted the outlook for US exporters of hydrocarbons. The weakness in September doesn’t seem justified by the fundamentals.

Just over four years ago Stuart Kirk, then HSBC’s head of Responsible Investment, gave a delightful presentation about the extreme hype over global warming that dominated the left wing and media. He accused presenters of trying to “out-hyperbole” one another, and noted that even though the presenter just before him had warned that humans would not survive, “…no-one ran from the room. In fact, most of you barely looked up from your mobile phones.”

The presentation hastened Kirk’s departure from HSBC, and he now writes a column for the Financial Times.

Since then, the shrill voices warning of the end of the planet have been replaced by more sober consideration that places climate change alongside other major challenges such as malnutrition, access to clean water and reliable electricity. Regulators in the US and EU have reduced the burden on companies to report on potential climate change impacts.

As for Stuart Kirk, he’s moved on to condemn the current fear that fiscal profligacy will condemn us all to penury (see The climate doom-mongers now dread sovereign debt blowouts). He’ll probably find a lot of familiar faces on the other side of this debate.

We have two funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.