Last week we were in Tampa and Orlando meeting with investors. It’s always a pleasure to see clients that have been with us for several years, because they’ve invariably had a positive experience. On the drive from Tampa to Orlando on I-4 we passed the exit for DisneyWorld, although sadly didn’t have time on this occasion to visit the Happiest Place on Earth. We will be back.

The signed truce with Iran weighed on energy stocks all week as crude slumped and foreign LNG prices fell. I think over the years our investor base has self-selected to consist mostly of those who aren’t too bothered by short term fluctuations, perhaps in part because we rarely have much useful to say about why the sector did what it did yesterday.

Consequently, the questions from the investors we met last week were focused on the long term outlook.

The Strait will re-open for at least 60 days, and Qatar expects its Ras Laffen LNG export terminal to be operational within a month. This is for the 83% of its capacity still working after an Iranian missile strike in March. There’s still lots of opportunity for hostilities to resume. Some interpret the text of the deal as allowing Iran to eventually charge a toll on ships passing through the Strait.

For now markets are assuming the best.

Nonetheless, Qatar’s reputation for reliability has been shattered by the disruption. Cheniere, Venture Global and NextDecade are among the LNG exporters set to benefit from the comparative safety of Texas and Louisiana, safely out of Iranian missile range.

The visibility around additional LNG export capacity assures ongoing demand for natural gas feedstock and related infrastructure.

Discussion often turned to data centers and their demand for electricity. Behind The Meter (BTM) discussions are reported to be widespread by Williams Companies (WMB) and Energy Transfer (ET), the two leading providers of natural gas for such arrangements. So far announced deals aren’t that numerous, but the capex plans for data centers seemingly assure that more will be forthcoming. Cleanview estimates that 59 projects are at various stages of development, with over half of these in energy-friendly Texas. But only around 2% of planned power generation is up and running.

Data centers are the big driver behind the expected increase in electricity demand. Over the past couple of decades it’s been close to flat at 4,000 Terawatt Hours (Twhs) annually, although picked up in recent years and reached 4,200 Twhs last year. Efficiencies have offset population growth. For example, the typical household refrigerator uses 30-40% less electricity than twenty years ago.

Projections are for growth of 35-50% over the next 15 years. Reshoring is another factor as manufacturing companies respond to tariffs and relatively cheap US energy to shift production back home. Increased electrification including market share gains for EVs and heat pumps is another factor, although smaller and more likely in blue states.

The SpaceX IPO was a common topic of conversation, including Elon Musk’s plans to put data enters into orbit. 24 hour access to sunlight and the cold temperatures of outer space sound compelling. Elon Musk’s plans have caught the public’s imagination and shorts have found it’s best not to bet against him. But the realization of such plans must be many years away.

Questions about Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) often come up. While there are many development efforts under way, none are at commercial scale. Google, Meta and Amazon are among those companies funding SMR development.

The challenges include obtaining sufficient quantities of High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), which is enriched between 5% and 20%. Russia has historically been the biggest supplier.

I used to wonder why the private sector couldn’t emulate the US navy, which relies on SMRs to power aircraft carriers and submarines. Then I ran into a retired nuclear physicist who explained that they run on weapons grade uranium because it’s very energy dense and can run for the entire useful life of the vessel (twenty years or more).

The civilian sector worldwide doesn’t use this type of uranium because of the risk that terrorists might obtain it and make a nuclear bomb. It’s pretty safe on an aircraft carrier.

It’s always interesting to see how many Florida residents didn’t always live there. People are fleeing north east states like Connecticut, New York and New Jersey in search of good public services with no income tax and a more pleasant climate. In spite of what is sometimes suggested, in my experience these new Floridians are reliably Republican, which is why Florida has moved from purple to red in recent years while New Jersey is solid blue.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.