Wells Fargo has recently suggested that the market may start paying more attention to the P/E ratios of midstream stocks. The sector has historically been valued using Free Cash Flow or Distributable Cash Flow (DCF), which is FCF less the maintenance capex necessary to preserve the value of existing assets.

P/E hasn’t been used much in the past because depreciation tends to understate the cash flow potential of infrastructure. The tax code allows for pipelines and other assets to be depreciated, while their ability to generate cash flow improves over time. Properly maintained, midstream infrastructure consists of appreciating assets.

I’m often reminded of the Transcontinental Gas Company’s pipeline built in the 1950s to move natural gas from Texas to population centers in the north east as far as New York City. This pipeline, long ago depreciated to zero, is part of the Transco system owned by Williams Companies. Allowing the owners to write down their investment for tax purposes didn’t reflect the actual value of the asset.

Wells Fargo thinks that the entry of generalist investors into midstream will encourage a more conventional approach to valuation. They cited South Bow (SOBO), the liquids pipeline spinoff from TC Energy last year, which looked unattractive based on DCF but better on P/E, and subsequently outperformed the sector.

Wells Fargo goes on to note that the midstream sector does trade at a P/E discount to the S&P500 (18.2 vs 21.7).

There has been some discussion that the new administration may reintroduce accelarated depreciation on some assets such as real estate although this could extend to infrastructure as well. By frontloading depreciation expense instead of using the straight-line method, it would depress near term earnings making P/Es look less attractive.

The spurt in power demand from data centers is likely to push capex higher for some of the natural gas-oriented pipelines. Because of this, investors relying on P/E are still likely to consider DCF and FCF yield as well in order to gain a more complete understanding of a company’s prospects. Earnings and cashflow are both important.

Friday’s strong payroll report cast more uncertainty on the prospects for further rate cuts from the Fed. The FOMC has the luxury of doing nothing for several months while the new administration’s policies take shape. Tariffs are widely considered inflationary. Extending the low tax rates due to expire this year will add fiscal stimulus to an already strong economy.

It’s a short step from the FOMC on hold to worrying about a potential resurgence in inflation. Should this happen, pipelines could offer useful protection since valuations are still attractive and roughly half the sector’s EBITDA comes from tariffs that have explicit inflation escalators built in. This was behind 2022’s 21% return on the American Energy Independence Index versus the S&P500’s -18%, when CPI inflation peaked at 9%.

Last year the world’s temperature averaged 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, the first time we’ve reached this threshold beyond which scientists warn that irreversible climate change is likely. It’s an incongruous thought at a time when most of the continental US is enduring well below average temperatures.

Sometimes I flippantly note that if global cooling was caused by rising CO2 levels, I’d be moved to install solar panels, buy a Tesla and adopt all the other virtue-signaling behavior of liberal zip codes. There’s a reason I leave New Jersey for Florida at this time of year.

What we’re seeing is the wholesale failure of progressive policies to reduce emissions, because they ignore the desire of developing countries to raise living standards with increased energy consumption and they naively believe intermittent, weather-dependent energy is the total solution.

It’s possible that policymakers may learn from this and adopt a pragmatic path to success, which would be a worldwide effort to encourage coal to gas switching for power generation. Critics of this approach argue that natgas still generates CO2. But it’s on average only half as much. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Emissions would come down.

The US has achieved the world’s best combination of reduced CO2 and economic growth by doing exactly this. The correct choice is to encourage similar behavior around the world, especially in emerging Asia.

The China Coal Transportation and Distribution Association expects output to rise 1.5% this year, an outcome wholly inconsistent with reducing emissions and one that makes a mockery of the constraints imposed on their citizens by liberal US states.

Even with the US withdrawing again from the Paris Climate Accord, we are well situated to support the successful implementation of such a coal-to-gas policy. This is the world’s best option. US exports of LNG can do more to reduce global emissions than the failing efforts of the past couple of decades.

We’re invested in natural gas infrastructure because we expect this will increasingly become clear to policymakers. Growth in US natural gas output continues to swamp renewables.

Last week my daughter and I braved frigid cold to ski in Vail with long-time friend and client Bill Edwards, whom we annually credit with also being Vail’s Best Ski Instructor. Like many of our clients, he was a friend first. Any skiing ability I have is a credit to his patient  instruction over many years. The lapses are my own work.

We have two have funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.