We’re approaching the time of year when report cards proclaiming, “what a joy your child is to have in my class” are dispatched with varying degrees of sincerity. Quarterly MLP earnings are the report cards of the industry, and a time when investors can similarly consider whether they are happy to have included PCD (Promised Cashflows Delivered, LP*) in their portfolios.
A couple of years ago Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) used to be a reliably boring sector. The influx of new money from ETF and mutual fund investors quickly turned and fled when oil started declining (see The 2015 MLP Crash; Why and What’s Next) which caused MLPs to be exciting in a decidedly distasteful way.
However, operating results for midstream infrastructure businesses weren’t remotely as volatile as their stock prices, which increasingly supports our theory of last year’s collapse; it was a funds flow issue caused by recent investors following (and thereby accentuating) near term momentum. Most firms have released their quarterly operating results, and they were generally decent with some mild positive surprises. MLPs rarely release figures that are substantially off expectations.
TransCanada (TRP) reaffirmed 8-10% growth in its current C$2.26 dividend (yielding 4.4%). Targa Resources (TRGP) experienced some modest softening of margins in their natural gas Gathering and Processing (G&P) segment although volumes were overall as expected. Western Gas (WES) reported EBITDA 15% ahead of expectations due to sharply higher production by Anadarko (APC), their sponsor. This allowed the GP of WES, Western Gas Equity Partners (WGP), to grow its distribution 24% YoY, twice the rate of WES. It’s why the people who run MLPs don’t invest in MLPs, but instead put their money in the GPs that run them. Hedge fund managers make their money from payments they receive from the hedge funds they manage. So it is with MLP managers. As the chart shows, if you add up where MLP insiders invest their own money they prefer GPs by a factor of 22X.
EnLink Midstream Partners (ENLK) was slightly ahead of expectations and provides 1.09X distribution coverage. Its sponsor and biggest customer Devon Energy (DVN) raised its production guidance by 3% having previously announced moves to shore up its balance sheet (asset sales, secondary equity offering and sharply reduced 2016 capex). Credit enhancement moves by DVN are good for its MLP. ENLK’s GP, EnLink Midstream (ENLC) yields 7.3%.
Spectra Energy Partners (SEP) reported EBITDA that was 7% below expectations as mild winter weather reduced natural gas volumes. They are pressing on with Access Northeast which will enhance natural gas distribution and storage in New England if it is implemented. Kinder Morgan (KMI) recently cancelled their North East Direct project due to insufficient demand, so it’ll be interesting to see how Access plays out. SEP increased its distribution 8% YoY. Their GP Spectra Energy Corp (SE) yields 5.3%.
Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) CEO Kelcy Warren has tried everything to extract himself from his ill-advised pursuit of Williams Companies (WMB). His former CFO lobbied WMB shareholders to reject the deal; with dubious legality and no fiduciary compunction ETE issued preferential securities to management, diluting the deal’s value to WMB; they also slashed the anticipated synergies from the original $2BN figure.
Risk arb traders are not a group that normally draws much sympathy. They buy stock in companies that are being acquired and hedge the position by shorting the acquirer. They bet on deals closing as anticipated, which they usually do. Frequent modest profits are occasionally punctuated by expensive surprises. The chart below shows the price of WMB compared with the actual price implied by the terms of the ETE deal. The smaller the spread (or discount to deal terms), the more likely it is to close. The bigger the spread, the less fun risk arb traders are having. You might also think of it as representing the fluctuating stress imposed on involved traders as the odds of the deal closing oscillated. Even Bobby Axelrod (from Billions) would have been challenged to make money. It’s a curious set of circumstances when the suitor experiences such rapid regret (see Williams Stands Alone at the Altar) and that made it harder for some to assess likely outcomes.
Kelcy Warren recently said of the deal, “We can’t close. We don’t have a transaction that can close. So I want to be very clear, we can’t close this transaction.” Since the absence of an affirmative tax opinion is the basis for this conclusion, we can assume that such insight was arrived at only belatedly (after the other forms of avoidance described above had been used). They may still close on altered terms, although since the WMB board was previously divided on the topic it’s hard to imagine them coming together on less favorable terms given recent history. ETE’s tax counsel has certainly earned their fee.
We are invested in ENLC, ETE, KMI, SE, TRP, WGP and WMB.
*PCD is not a real company
The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments. Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.
References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)
This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r
Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.
Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.