Betting On Gas With LNG

In March we wrote about start-up Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) exporter, NextDecade (NEXT) (see Making LNG Cleaner). As with Tellurian (TELL) and Cheniere (LNG) before them, NEXT needs to sign up buyers of its LNG before obtaining the financing to complete the liquefaction infrastructure. The rolling global energy crisis which has seen European and Asian buyers paying over $35 per Million BTUs (MMBTUs) for shipments has improved the outlook for US LNG exports. The $25 per MMBTU regional difference with US domestic prices is testament to the constraints posed by limited LNG export capacity. NEXT aims to partially solve that – foreign buyers are eager, although US customers will wind up paying marginally more as increased exports push up prices.

French utility Engie pulled out of discussions with NEXT late last year because they were unhappy at buying Texan natural gas given the prevalence of flaring. Regulators in Texas have interpreted their oversight of methane flaring very broadly, with the result that flaring permits are routinely granted. In 2019 a dispute arose between Exco, a natural gas driller, and Williams Companies over Exco’s application to flare natural gas rather than pay the tariff Williams demanded for pipeline transportation (see Texas Reconsiders Flaring). It showed how Texas’ ready approval of flaring had abandoned the original intent, which was to allow the flaring of associated gas where no infrastructure existed in order to allow crude oil production. Williams argued that the natural gas infrastructure was available, but that Exco didn’t like the price. In September, a judge ruled in Williams favor but that may not be the conclusion.

European LNG buyers are likely to share Engie’s sensitivity to how their product is produced, so NEXT created a “carbon solutions” unit to capture the CO2 associated with their LNG activities. Last week SL Advisors partner Henry Hoffman chatted with management during Cowen’s 2021 Energy Summit.

We think NEXT is under the radar for most investors. They do have some sell-side coverage though. Credit Suisse raised them from Neutral to Outperform in March, which gave the stock a boost. The company has a firm offtake deal with Shell to deliver 2 million tons per annum (MPTA) of natural gas for 20 years. NEXT needs agreements on 9 MPTA more in order to fully sell out capacity for Phase 1 of their proposed Rio Grande facility in south Texas. They are optimistic that they’ll reach this goal next quarter, reporting discussions on volumes well in excess of what’s needed.

The Administration’s Build Back Better legislation, which is currently with the Senate, may boost revenues at Next Carbon Solutions if the CO2 tax credits are sufficient to stimulate additional demand for the new unit’s services.

NEXT is aiming to provide “green” methane, whose production is certified to have resulted in minimum methane leaks along with the capture and sequestration of the CO2 generated in its processing and eventual liquefaction for transfer to LNG tankers.

Henry Hoffman also held discussions with Tellurian’s (TELL) management. TELL’s founder and CEO is Charif Souki, whose weekly Youtube videos have developed a following among retail investors. We like TELL too, but Souki has an unpredictable, risk-seeking streak. He was forced out of Cheniere by Carl Icahn who opposed Souki’s plans to expand into natural gas trading. Why complicate a business with years of cashflow visibility not exposed to natural gas prices?

Last year Souki suffered a margin call on his personal holdings of TELL when the stock collapsed during the Covid rout. He has a healthy risk appetite. We also didn’t like the August secondary offering which was done at a substantial discount to the prevailing price. TELL has a business model that incorporates exposure to LNG prices, which is probably making it harder to finance but allows greater upside if LNG prices remain firm, as Souki believes they will.

TELL told us they were in discussions with private equity investors, which we think could be good as it will improve corporate governance, and get the company closer to having enough financing to begin construction of their LNG facility.

Natural gas remains the most impactful way for the world to lower emissions, by reducing reliance on  coal. Recently an overly hasty effort to transition to renewables in Europe has exposed weaknesses in their energy strategy and created further demand for natural gas. Although $35 per MMBTU is likely unsustainable, the long term demand for LNG is clear.

NEXT and TELL both offer the opportunity to invest in continued global demand growth for natural gas. We are invested in them.

We have three funds that seek to profit from this environment:

Energy Mutual Fund

Energy ETF

Inflation Fund

Please see important Legal Disclosures.

Please sign up here for our webinar, Making Sense of Rising Inflation and the Global Energy Crisis, on Thursday, December 16 at 12 noon Eastern.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
3 replies
  1. John Young
    John Young says:

    Check out NextDecade’s corporate website at https://www.next-decade.com/. It seems to have been abandoned early August 2021.

    It’s last Press Release is dated 08-03-2021 (NextDecade Comments on Recent Court Actions), https://investors.next-decade.com/newsroom.

    It’s Resources page postings are all 2020 or undated, https://www.next-decade.com/resources/.

    It’s most recent 08-02-2021 Corporate Presentation is no longer on its Resources page and is now just a one pager at https://investors.next-decade.com/static-files/5341eedf-522f-4e07-a86c-4918491b692b.

    The last event on its Event page is a September 27-28 (Carbon Capture Symposium) with no Upcoming Events listed, https://investors.next-decade.com/events.

    Incorporated in November 2010, it’s proposed a number of projects (Pelican Bay LNG, a FSRU non-binding MOU with the Irish Port of Cork, Galveston Bay LNG) it held up as eye candy for investors, now all gone without a trace. In February 2020 it sold its Rio Bravo Pipeline to Enbridge. Early this year it added its proposed NEXT Carbon Solutions project to its Rio Grande LNG project. It’s Rio Grande LNG project keeps falling further and further behind schedule and remains undersubscribed (Shell committing to 2 mtpa 04-01-2018 of the 11 mtpa needed to make FID on two or maybe 3 of 5 planned LNG liquefaction production trains to be built one at a time). FERC gave it the go ahead to start Procurement, Site Preparation, and Initial Construction in March 2020 but it’s done none of this and has no plans to do any such this December. Instead, it’s executed its option to put off the execution of its site lease until 05-31-2022. It’s EPS price guarantee from Bechtel expires 12-31-2021 but the other terms of their agreement don’t expire until 12-31-2021 (if I recall correctly).

    Reply
  2. Gordon
    Gordon says:

    Another great write-up. Hopefully you’ll be putting together a 2022 pipeline outlook video (similar to last December’s 2021 outlook).

    Reply
  3. John Young
    John Young says:

    Rio Grande LNG has probably gotten more blowback than it counted on in terms of Motions to Intervene against its 11-17-2021 Application of Rio Grande LNG, LLC for Limited Amendment to NGA Section 3 Authorization under FERC Docket Number CP22-17-000 (rather than under its usual Docket Number CP16-454-000. Whether you’re for or against LNG, NextDecade’s RGLNG is way behind schedule and way undersubscribed, got its FERC permit 11-22-2019 and FERC “Notice to Proceed with Implementation Plan and Site Preparation/Mobilization” to RGLNG on 03-06-2020 (http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20200306-3076). But it hasn’t yet been able to put shovel to ground. For a comprehensive look at NextDecade’s chronic performance problems, check out my 12-21-2021 Comment 4 opposed to RGLNG’s 11-22-2021 Application: https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/filelist?accession_num=20211220-5240. Or check out NextDecade’s dead in the water corporate website at https://www.next-decade.com/. It looks like it was abandoned in early August 2021. It has a history of issuing new Corporate Presentations every month or two but its last one was dated 08-03-2021 and is no longer available on the website beyond a one page nature photo of a big flock of birds flying offshore towards open waters: https://investors.next-decade.com/static-files/5341eedf-522f-4e07-a86c-4918491b692b.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.