As Bad as IBM's Been, Amazon's Been Worse

About a year ago our newsletter compared the valuation of IBM and Amazon (AMZN). At the time IBM had a P/E of 10X (AMZN’s was 166X), was growing Free Cash Flow (versus flat at AMZN) and seemed wholly more attractively priced than AMZN. As we noted then, we owned IBM and not AMZN, where  we think that being a customer is so much better than being an owner.

A year later, IBM has so far been a disappointment. Its most recent quarterly earnings saw continued weak sales, an abandonment of their long-held 2015 forecast of $20 in EPS,  and a payment of $1.5 billion to a firm kind enough to take their loss-making chip manufacturing business off their hands. From November 1, 2013 through today IBM has returned -7% (including dividends), substantially worse than the S&P500’s +13.5% total return over the same period.

It’s hard to compare the P/E they were trading at last year with their current level, because for now management isn’t making a 2015 earnings forecast. However, using consensus estimates of $16.91, it’s trading at less than last year’s 10X multiple that we found attractive. The critics point to the challenge of adapting their business model to cloud-based software as a service and away from their licensing model. So far events seems to agree with them. And yet, the company continues to generate $12-14 billion of free cashflow, some of which buys back stock which helps its per share metrics. We were obviously early with IBM, but are staying the course.

Although it’s hard to believe, owning AMZN for the past year would have been worse than the 20% relative underperformance delivered by IBM. AMZN CEO Jeff Bezos and his penchant for putting growth ahead of profits helped drive AMZN’s most recent quarterly earnings disappointment and is behind their -20% one year return, 33% worse than the S&P500. Bezos has always wanted to deliver profits sometime in the future. It’s why they’re such an exciting company to watch and why I buy all kinds of obscure items without having to set foot in a brick and mortar store. In the last several weeks I have bought beach shoes, a replacement license plate light bulb, batteries, leather luggage tags, a belt and several 1lb bags of shelled Brazil nuts. I love AMZN investors for helping keep the company’s cost of capital low so that they can offer all these products and millions of others.

Some people thought long AMZN/short IBM was a great pairs trade. Well, IBM certainly has been a worse investment than the S&P500, but handily better than AMZN. If you’re not leveraged, waiting for IBM to beat the benchmark as well isn’t that expensive.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.