Betting against a crisis is almost always the right approach. If you invest without leverage, you’re afforded the luxury of waiting to see how events play out without caring too much about the path equity prices take. It might very well be that the latest round of negotiations will result in the ultimately more stable Euro the whole world now desires. While being long equities reflects a belief that things will work out, borrowing money to do so would reflect more conviction than is warranted. A big question is precisely what mechanism will be used to enforce budgetary discipline in the future, since the Maastricht Criteria (limits on deficits at 3% of GDP; debt at 60% of GDP) were as much use as the Maginot Line against the German panzers in 1940. In fact, Germany and France were among the first countries to violate this law, and consequently the fines (set at implausibly high levels such as 1% of a country’s GDP) were never imposed. It’s unclear how such fines could ever be imposed, and a key element supporting the imposition of fiscal discipline remains to be defined.
It occurred to me that one solution might be to limit each country’s banking exposure to profligate nations. Instead of emphasizing rules for the borrowers, impose rules on the lenders. Germany could pass a law preventing its own banks from incurring country risk to, say, Spain in excess of 5% of a bank’s tier one capital. All the current measures impose penalties on the debt addicts, but the dealers who provide the fix are part of the problem too. This would seem to be a solution well within the ability of each creditor country to impose unilaterally without requiring a treaty overhaul, and would also limit creditor nations’ exposure to rule-breaking profligacy in the south. It seems a simple measure, I’m not sure why it’s not part of the solution.
The Economist magazine noted on the weekend that Sweden (an EU but non-Euro member) has imposed 12% Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets requirements on its own banking system. Overleveraged banks are no doubt a substantial part of the problem. Sweden has prospered outside the Euro zone (though its export-driven economy is expected to suffer next year given a likely Eurozone recession). More countries should follow the model of Sweden and adopt more realistic leverage rules in their banking systems.
Meanwhile, long $100 of SPY and long $40 of EUO provides exposure to attractively priced stocks in combination with a short € position since most disaster scenarios for the stock market start in Europe. The relationship between the two has tightened in recent weeks – Eurozone sovereign debt solutions promote austerity and are negative for growth; a melt-down clearly is; muddling through with neither of the above should be (in fact, has already been) positive for equities and only mildly bullish for the €.
Disclosure: Author is Long SPY, Long EUO
The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments. Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.
References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)
This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r
Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.
Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.