Fiscal issues dominated the last few weeks of 2012 and are likely to provide headlines during the next several months as well. Therefore, it’s worth contemplating what it means for investors. Following this most recent skirting of disaster with the Fiscal Cliff, it’s possible to draw some inferences about how the ongoing budgetary debate will unfold. Both parties believe they won an electoral mandate for their policies. President Obama won re-election, but the House of Representatives remained Republican. Moreover, there is less reason to expect this form of divided government to lead to grand compromise. The partisan split in Congress with fewer tight electoral contests is increasing the importance of the primaries in selecting candidates. Less turnover in Congressional seats gives the dominant party’s core voters greater influence. This is most obvious in the House Republicans’ rejection of compromise recently, revealing a greater fear of Tea Party challengers in 18 months than a general election loss. Similar dynamics exist for Democrats. The New York Times recently noted that Americans are showing a greater tendency to cluster in neighborhoods of like-minded people, a development that will exacerbate the current trend towards argumentative government by further reducing the competitiveness of elections for the House of Representatives.
Given the absence of much long term budget repair in the latest brinkmanship combined with the polarizing dynamic described above, it seems that the most realistic expectation is for quite modest fiscal improvements albeit achieved under the threat of government-induced catastrophe. The debt ceiling will no doubt provide another flashpoint for differing philosophies fairly soon. The fact that the recent compromise relied mostly on taxes with no meaningful spending cuts probably means the Republicans will look to this next manufactured crisis as an opportunity to advance that aspect of their agenda. It won’t be long.
Moreover, for all the hand-wringing over the long term outlook, it’s not clear that there is much coherent political support for fixing it. Raising taxes and cutting entitlements are intensely unpopular. The near term benefits of prudence are hard to identify. The Federal Reserve is quite possibly shielding the economy from unhindered bond market feedback on the fiscal outlook through quantitative easing, so low interest rates don’t portend much actual trouble. It’s like predicting global warming during a blizzard – hard to get much serious attention.
For an investor, there is probably a little more certainty over public policy than was the case a month ago. Our government is not bold in confronting problems, but there is a certain predictable logic driving decisions. As a result, there is far more certainty about fiscal policy than was the case last month. Incremental improvements punctuated by a crisis with a dramatic conclusion are beginning to look like a pattern. It’s not exactly what the Bowles-Simpson Commission recommended, but it appears to be what the next couple of years at least have in store.
The increased certainty and the absence of any significant fiscal drag should allow corporations to make more confident long term decisions and be positive for growth, albeit punctuated with a political crisis from time to time. Equities continue to be attractive relative to fixed income. The Equity Risk Premium remains historically very wide, and with interest rates likely to remain below inflation (more so after taxes are included) government and high grade corporate bond markets remain a safe way to steadily lose purchasing power. It remains the case that 23 cents invested in equities will, with 4% dividend growth, deliver the same ten year return as $1 invested in ten year treasuries. After taxes with the new rates on income, dividends and capital gains the Math requires only 19 cents. High grade corporate bonds alter the comparison only modestly.
Income generating securities came under pressure late in 2012. As it turned out the increase in investment tax rates wasn’t as punitive as might have been feared. The Low Beta anomaly persists, so our Hedged Dividend Capture Strategy (“DivCap”) consisting of a long/short portfolio of $100 in stable, dividend paying stocks hedged with $50 short the S&P 500 provides a good way to pick up dividend income with minimal equity volatility. I’m currently adding to that strategy myself.
Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) also gave up some ground in recent weeks. But the tax treatment of MLPs did not change and with higher ordinary income tax rates the tax-deferred nature of the distributions is now relatively more attractive compared with other income generating sectors on an after tax basis. If Congress decides to tackle tax reform this year MLPs will probably be vulnerable. However, their tax treatment has existed for over a quarter century (since the 1986 Tax Reform Act under Reagan) and improved energy infrastructure is an easily defended policy goal. Moreover, overhauling the nation’s tax code will require a grand compromise between both parties so far removed from recent discourse that it barely justifies consideration.
The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments. Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.
References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)
This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r
Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.
All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.
Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.