Insiders Are Reinvesting Back into MLPs

It’ll be a while before Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) will fairly be described as no longer in a bear market. So far the low point was on February 11th, at which point the Alerian Index was 58.2% below its all-time high of August 2014. The following day, SEC filings revealed institutional purchases by Berkshire Hathaway (BRK), hedge fund Appaloosa and the Oklahoma Teachers Retirement System (see Real Money Moves Into Real Assets), and this seems to have been the catalyst for a modest improvement in investor sentiment. Rising crude didn’t hurt either, and the result has been that the 30.2% three week bounce in MLPs since that February 11th low is the largest rally since making their August 2014 high.

A technically driven rally is nice, but it’s also interesting to see the level of insider buying in recent months. Just among eight stocks that we follow, we’ve calculated almost half a billion dollars of insider purchases over the past twelve months. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) is the biggest at $185MM, funded in part by the constant reinvestment of distributions by management. Other purchases of note include $108MM at Energy Transfer Equity (ETE). Crestwood Equity Partners (CEQP), a speculative and therefore appropriately small investment of ours, saw insiders purchase a startling 9.4% of the public float during 4Q15. Tallgrass Energy GP (TEGP) also saw insiders buy 1.7% of the float. It’s worth remembering that these purchases and others are generally funded by distributions paid out to those very same investors. MLPs are highly cash generative businesses.

  Selected Insider Buying in Past 12 Months
Company Ticker Amount ($MMs) % of Float Purchased
Crestwood Equity CEQP 90 9.4%
Enterprise Products EPD 185 0.5%
EQT GP Holdings EQGP 5 0.8%
Energy Transfer Equity ETE 108 0.4%
Kinder Morgan KMI 43 0.1%
NuStar GP Holdings NSH 16 1.8%
Plains GP Holdings PAGP 16 0.9%
Tallgrass Energy GP TEGP 23 1.7%


There have been other informed buyers beyond the institutions and insiders mentioned above. Plains All America (PAA) issued $1.6BN in convertible preferred units to a group of private equity investors that were already invested in Plains and therefore know the business well. They included EnCap Investments, First Reserve and Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners. Targa Resources (TRGP) issued $500MM in similar securities to Stonepeak.

I was chatting with a friend who is a financial advisor the other day, and I asked him what sector of the equity market (apart from MLPs) offers the best opportunity right now. He felt that low volatility, dividend paying stocks could provide a return of better than 10% over the next four quarters. We like that sector too, and we have run a Low Vol Strategy for many years that regularly generates attractive returns (see Why the Tortoise Beats the Hare). It’s a great place to be invested. And yet, there are MLPs yielding well over 10%.

As we noted in last week’s blog (MLP Managements Talk Business), any equity security which confounds the skeptics by paying its dividend for a year will, assuming this draws in additional buyers that drive its yield down by 2%, deliver a 30%+ total return to those who invested a year earlier. Many MLPs still offer this possibility. Given the collapse in MLPs since August 2014, they ought to offer this kind of potential return. In early February after only 9 business days, MLPs were down 19%. Today’s MLP investors have endured some torrid days. But if you invest where you assess a high probability of continued distributions, it’s hard to think of another asset class or sector that comes close. There’s increasing evidence that insiders and institutional investors are acting on that belief.

By way of example of the high yields in the sector, Williams Companies (WMB) on Friday declared a $0.64 dividend. At $19.15, where it closed on Friday, this would be a respectable 3.3% yield if the $0.64 was an annual dividend. But it’s actually a quarterly dividend, so WMB yields 13.37%. Some investors were probably not expecting another WMB dividend so it was a welcome surprise. If the merger with Energy Transfer Equity (ETE) goes through on current terms, when it closes WMB investors will receive dividends of $1.74 annually from the 1.5274 shares of Energy Transfer Corp (ETC) they’ll swap for their WMB shares. But they’ll also receive a one-time $8 cash payment plus a $0.10 special dividend,  so $1.74 on an $11.05 stock price ($19.15 less the $8.10 payments) is 15.75%. The Presidential election is not the only thing that can make your jaw drop.

We are invested in BRK, CEQP, EPD, EQGP, ETE, KMI, NSH, PAGP, TEGP and WMB

Wall Street Potholes — Insights From Top Money Managers on Avoiding Dangerous Products

On Monday, March 14th at 6:15pm, at the Hilton Hasbrouck Heights, Hasbrouck Heights, NJ, I’ll be giving a presentation on my new book, Wall Street Potholes,  to the American Association of Independent Investors, Northern New Jersey Chapter. There is a modest entry fee. I’ll also be giving a similar presentation on Wednesday, March 23rd at 7pm at the Westfield Memorial Library, Westfield, NJ. Attendance is free.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Important Disclosures

The information provided is for informational purposes only and investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, security or product is suitable for their investment needs. The information contained herein is not complete, may not be current, is subject to change, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the more complete disclosures, risk factors and other terms that are contained in the disclosure, prospectus, and offering. Certain information herein has been obtained from third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy,  completeness or timeliness of this information. Nothing provided on this site constitutes tax advice. Individuals should seek the advice of their own tax advisor for specific information regarding tax consequences of investments.  Investments in securities entail risk and are not suitable for all investors. This site is not a recommendation nor an offer to sell (or solicitation of an offer to buy) securities in the United States or in any other jurisdiction.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in an index and do not reflect the deduction of the advisor’s fees or other trading expenses. There can be no assurance that current investments will be profitable. Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs, and the timing of the purchase. Indexes and benchmarks may not directly correlate or only partially relate to portfolios managed by SL Advisors as they have different underlying investments and may use different strategies or have different objectives than portfolios managed by SL Advisors (e.g. The Alerian index is a group MLP securities in the oil and gas industries. Portfolios may not include the same investments that are included in the Alerian Index. The S & P Index does not directly relate to investment strategies managed by SL Advisers.)

This site may contain forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the U.S. market generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involves a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of SL Advisors LLC or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made. r

Certain hyperlinks or referenced websites on the Site, if any, are for your convenience and forward you to third parties’ websites, which generally are recognized by their top level domain name. Any descriptions of, references to, or links to other products, publications or services does not constitute an endorsement, authorization, sponsorship by or affiliation with SL Advisors LLC with respect to any linked site or its sponsor, unless expressly stated by SL Advisors LLC. Any such information, products or sites have not necessarily been reviewed by SL Advisors LLC and are provided or maintained by third parties over whom SL Advisors LLC exercise no control. SL Advisors LLC expressly disclaim any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information, and/or quality of products or services provided by or advertised on these third-party sites.

All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be suitable or profitable for a client’s investment portfolio.

Past performance of the American Energy Independence Index is not indicative of future returns.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
2 replies
  1. Metsox
    Metsox says:

    Would be interested to hear your thoughts on CPPL/CPGX. The former has fallen 25% after news broke of TRP buying CPGX. Seems like the GP always wins. Unless it’s ETE. And then Kelcy wins.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.