Energy By The Numbers
I traveled from San Diego to Portland, OR last week and enjoyed a delicious wine pairing dinner in nearby Oswego with a group of investors. Oregon is wine country, and its residents are knowledgeable about varietals and vintages. I met some people who cultivate vines as a hobby and enjoy producing enough to fill a few five gallon jugs.
Over six courses and wines we discussed investments. Although we hold US and Canadian midstream companies, energy is a global business and many of the upside opportunities come from demand growth in emerging economies.
The Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy, formerly published by BP, is a rich source of data on global energy production, consumption and trade. It can be helpful to understand the broad trends at work in considering the future. An enduring theme concerns the energy transition, which pits the desire of rich, mainly OECD countries to reduce emissions against the drive for higher living standards common across emerging countries.
.avia-image-container.av-1y2qe3d-0d8acc592ddfc46926636d51c4247960 img.avia_image{ box-shadow:none; } .avia-image-container.av-1y2qe3d-0d8acc592ddfc46926636d51c4247960 .av-image-caption-overlay-center{ color:#ffffff; }
Per capita energy consumption and GDP are highly correlated. Billions of people want to live like Americans, and who can blame them? The Energy Institute (EI) estimates that 750 million people don’t have access to electricity to light their homes, refrigerate their food or run air conditioning. 2.6 billion people rely on wood, charcoal, coal or animal waste for heating and cooking. They want better.
In June Pakistan experienced a heatwave that sent thousands of people to hospital and killed hundreds.
Naturally it was blamed on climate change, as is every extreme weather event nowadays. Poorer countries are more vulnerable to a warmer climate, and yet the rational policy choice for Pakistanis is to buy more air conditioning, meaning more energy consumption. Only 6% of their electricity comes from solar and wind. That’s the problem.
.avia-image-container.av-1u016mx-bb07164aba6b28ce4de5b83ecd99cdb6 img.avia_image{ box-shadow:none; } .avia-image-container.av-1u016mx-bb07164aba6b28ce4de5b83ecd99cdb6 .av-image-caption-overlay-center{ color:#ffffff; }
Comparing the US and China neatly captures the changes between rich and developing countries. China’s primary energy consumption passed the US in 2009, eight years after they joined the World Trade Organization, and has never looked back. China’s population is 4X the US. That reaching this milestone took so long is a testament to the penalty decades of communism imposed on its people until its leaders embraced their unique form of capitalism without democracy.
China’s per capita energy consumption remains less than half the US, which is among the world’s highest. Canada, which considers itself a leader on climate change, undercuts this claim since the typical Canadian uses 30% more energy than her American neighbor to the south. It’s because Canada is cold, with a relatively dispersed population which means more long journeys, and some energy-intensive industries such as pulp and paper along with oil and gas production.
It’s notable that China’s per capita energy consumption is now the same as the EU, with each series moving in opposite directions. The calculation is simply energy used divided by population. As OECD countries outsource manufacturing to developing ones it can flatter their emissions. But Germany is also de-industrializing as companies flee restrictive energy policies with some of the world’s highest prices.
In the trade-off between emissions reduction and GDP growth, China and the EU have opposing priorities.
.avia-image-container.av-w259tl-75e9e8d206439da1849191a6b39356c8 img.avia_image{ box-shadow:none; } .avia-image-container.av-w259tl-75e9e8d206439da1849191a6b39356c8 .av-image-caption-overlay-center{ color:#ffffff; }
China’s total Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs) passed the US in 2004. Former White House Climate Czar John Kerry used to praise China’s efforts on climate change because of their enormous investments in solar and wind. These intermittent sources provide almost twice as much primary energy as in the US. But everything about China’s energy sector is huge. They burn 56% of the world’s coal, more than 11X the US.
China’s energy policies are better viewed from the standpoint of energy security rather than the energy transition. They are reducing their dependence on foreign-sourced crude oil, because when the inevitable conflict over Taiwan happens their imports will be vulnerable to western sanctions.
.avia-image-container.av-lvr455-fd80b5b9681db911d65b13aadc035c21 img.avia_image{ box-shadow:none; } .avia-image-container.av-lvr455-fd80b5b9681db911d65b13aadc035c21 .av-image-caption-overlay-center{ color:#ffffff; }
An area that gets too little attention is the enormous growth in US production of Natural Gas Liquids (NGLs). Think ethane (used to manufacture plastics) or propane (used for crop drying and in your outdoor gas grill, and for restaurants in places like Naples, FL that are unserved by natural gas).
US NGL output has grown at 9.5% pa over the past decade. We now produce almost half (47%) the NGLs in the world, up from 29% a decade ago. We export around 1.7 Million Barrels per Day of propane. Japan and China are the two biggest markets, together taking around 40% of exports.
None of this would have happened without fracking and the shale revolution. This in turn was made possible by privately owned mineral rights, a uniquely American concept that allows landowner and driller to negotiate, regulated and taxed by the state. It’s brought us to energy independence.
Another reason why this is a great country.
We have three have funds that seek to profit from this environment: